We Proudly Serve All of California
CALL 24/7 FOR AFREE
CONSULTATION
800-789-8840
The dram shop laws in California take a very limited approach to holding alcohol providers responsible for injuries caused by intoxicated individuals. Bars, restaurants, and social hosts usually cannot be sued for serving alcohol to an adult who later causes harm.
State laws treat the act of drinking alcohol—not serving it—as the legal cause of an injury in these cases. That said, there is one major exception: a provider may be held liable if they sell or furnish alcohol to an obviously intoxicated minor who then injures or kills someone.
When alcohol-related accidents happen, these situations can be confusing. A Los Angeles injury lawyer can help you understand whether the minor-intoxication exception may apply to your case and what your legal options might look like moving forward.
California’s approach to dram shop liability is narrow. In many other states, the laws allow broad claims against servers or hosts when an intoxicated patron causes harm.
However, in California, the laws generally do not impose civil liability on bars, restaurants, or social hosts for injuries caused by intoxicated adults. The law’s major, limited exception applies when alcohol is served to an obviously intoxicated minor, defined as a person under 21.
This means that, under California state laws, a person or business that serves alcohol is not legally responsible for the later harmful acts of an intoxicated adult patron.
This reflects the legislature’s judgment that the act of furnishing alcohol is not the cause of injuries that follow from consumption.
The primary civil cause of action that remains in California is for serving alcohol to an obviously intoxicated minor.
Business and Professions Code section 25602.1 and related jury instructions allow a claim when a commercial seller or social host serves alcohol to someone under the age of 21 who is already showing clear signs of intoxication, and that minor then causes injury or death.
Courts and jury instructions focus on whether the intoxication was obvious. For example, if slurred speech, loss of balance, aggressive actions, or erratic behavior were present but the server ignored those signs, this may reflect a situation in which intoxication was obvious.
To succeed on a claim, a plaintiff generally needs evidence that the minor’s intoxication was plainly visible and that the server either failed to notice or continued service despite obvious impairment.
Typical evidence includes surveillance video, witness statements, staff testimony, photos from that point in time, or police reports showing outward signs of intoxication. Courts will then examine whether the server’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing the harm.
Licensed businesses—such as bars, restaurants, and liquor stores—as well as private hosts are treated differently in various parts of the law, but the same narrow rule applies.
Liability for injuries caused by an intoxicated person is rare unless the injured party can show the server furnished alcohol to an obviously intoxicated minor.
Criminal penalties and separate statutory offenses for serving minors still exist, but those do not automatically create a civil cause of action except in the limited circumstances described above.
Because California’s dram shop liability is limited, victims of alcohol-related crashes or assaults often must rely primarily on claims against the intoxicated person and their auto insurance, or on other negligence theories where applicable.
Where the intoxicated person is a minor and evidence shows obvious intoxication at the time they were served, a dram shop or social-host claim may be viable and worth pursuing.
Careful investigation and early evidence collection, including videos, witness contact information, and staff statements, can make all the difference.
When a dram shop claim against a server of a minor is successful, recoverable damages are the same types typically available in personal injury cases:
From there, insurance issues become important rather quickly. Commercial liability insurance, homeowners’ insurance for private hosts, and the intoxicated person’s auto coverage might all be involved.
Insurers frequently contest liability and comparative fault, so reach out to a Los Angeles injury attorney for experienced legal representation.
Understanding the dram shop laws in California is the first step in protecting your rights after an alcohol-related injury. If an intoxicated person harmed you, BANA LAW is here to offer the legal support that you need.
You can rely on us to treat your case with the care, clarity, and advocacy that you deserve. We are dedicated to providing you with hands-on guidance as we aggressively build your case. Your injury is our fight, and we take that responsibility seriously.
With former insurance adjusters on staff and a commitment to using top-tier professionals to prove liability, we invest in every case as if it will go to trial. Backed by over 100 years of combined experience, we’ve helped thousands of people, and we want to help you, too.